Skip to Main Content
Andrea J. Horbinski (
2012-08-07 09:07 pm (UTC)
The line given to the ML was "we will be seeking out wrangler input, which we appreciate and value."
Yes. But that email was introductory, rather than the one actually seeking input. (Which, as I've said before, regardless I think it was fine to express at that point and at any point. Just not abusively.)
When I said above that I can't point out specific people or emails, I meant that - I'm no longer a tag wrangler or on the mailing list, and my own position as the Chair of another committee renders it doubly inappropriate that I be naming volunteers for another committee to a volunteer. So, this is to explain that I've seen your request, but I don't think there's any way that I can respond to it without violating my own understanding of standards of conduct. And since, like
, I do want the OTW to be treated professionally, it's incumbent on me to behave professionally. I'm sorry that I can't answer your question specifically.
Reply to this
Thread from start
Post a comment in response:
This account has disabled anonymous posting.
You can comment on this post while signed in with an account from many other sites, once you have confirmed your email address.
Sign in using OpenID
If you don't have an account you can
create one now
HTML doesn't work in the subject.
Check spelling during preview
This account is set to log the IP addresses of everyone who comments.
Links will be displayed as unclickable URLs to help prevent spam.
Log in with OpenID?
Forget your password?
Site and Journal Search
Buy Dreamwidth Services
Gift a Random User
Site and Account